METHODOLOGY / ENTITY RESOLUTION

Entity-resolution methodology

How AUMSearch should connect advisers, managers, CRD numbers, CIKs, names, affiliates, and filing records with evidence and confidence.

EDITORIAL OWNER AUMSEARCH DATA EDITORIAL

LAST REVIEWED

SOURCE STANDARD PRIMARY PUBLIC RECORDS

DIRECT ANSWER

Definition

Entity resolution connects source-specific records that refer to the same or related legal and reporting entities. AUMSearch preserves CRD and CIK identifiers separately, supports one-to-many relationships, records the evidence for each join, and leaves ambiguous relationships unresolved.

01

Evidence hierarchy

  • Explicit identifier or relationship reported in an official source.
  • Deterministic mapping from stable source fields.
  • Multiple corroborating attributes such as legal name, address, website, ownership, and filing history.
  • Human review of the underlying records.
  • Name similarity alone is insufficient.

02

Relationship confidence

StatusMeaning
DirectThe source explicitly reports the relationship
DeterministicStable source fields produce an unambiguous mapping
High-confidence inferredMultiple independent attributes support the relationship
ReviewedA human verified the source records
UnresolvedEvidence is insufficient or conflicting

03

Relationships are not always one-to-one

One adviser brand can include multiple legal entities. One CRD record can relate to multiple EDGAR filer accounts, and one Form 13F filing can involve other managers. Parent, affiliate, relying-adviser, and filing-manager relationships must be modeled rather than collapsed.

04

Challenges and corrections

Readers should be able to report a suspected bad join. A correction should preserve the prior mapping, evidence, change date, and affected records rather than silently rewriting history.

SRC

Primary sources

Definitions and regulatory claims on this page are grounded in the following official public resources.